View: PM Narendra Modi is making the same huge economic mistake as Jawaharlal Nehru


A vital element of the myth-making round Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi is to reduce the contribution of the nation’s foundational figures. None has suffered greater than Jawaharlal Nehru, the man who laid down the rails on which the republic has run for 74 years. Which makes it stunning that Modi is emulating a signature Nehru coverage and, paradoxically, one which failed: self-sufficiency. Why is a Twenty first-century chief borrowing a discredited Nineteen Forties concept that was given up in the Nineties?

The Harrow and Cambridge-educated Nehru, son of a rich lawyer, was an internationalist. But when it got here to choosing a developmental technique, he by no means had a lot of a alternative. Taking cost in 1947 of a newly impartial nation ravaged by two centuries of British colonial plunder, he was compelled to comply with a closed-economy method. For one factor, World War II had brought on a huge world scarcity in capital items. The metal that would go into tractors had ended up in tanks. How to import any machines, or pay for them? Especially when India’s export benefit in cotton and jute was misplaced after partition, to West and East Pakistan, now Bangladesh.

Nehru’s different drawback was the Soviets. By the mid-Fifties, they’d infiltrated the Indian planning course of with their mannequin of fast, heavy industrialization. The concept of manufacturing one’s personal metal to make machines to then manufacture bicycles was seductive, even when it meant not having sufficient trousers and toys, or shirts and sneakers, to promote cheaply at house and globally and take up surplus farm labor. This put India on a path of slower urbanization and development than in East Asia’s tiger economies.


Modi is approaching the drawback from a distinct angle. A preferred chief who got here to politics on a platform of muscular nationalism, he dismantled Nehru’s planning equipment shortly after turning into prime minister in 2014. Modi had none of Nehru’s class privileges. As a younger boy, he helped his father promote tea at a small railway station in Gujarat, in keeping with a 2013 biography. In his second five-year time period as prime minister, Modi is counting on the same method that gained him success as chief minister of Gujarat state: extremely capital-intensive industrialization, supported by infrastructure and investor-friendly insurance policies.

To flip India right into a manufacturing unit to the world, Modi has put collectively a five-year infrastructure undertaking pipeline value 111 trillion rupees ($1.5 trillion), greater than what the nation has invested in nearly the earlier 20 years. He has slashed company tax charges, merged 29 labor codes into 4, and introduced $28 billion in production-linked fiscal incentives. The cash is earmarked for companies that put up factories making every part from cellphones and auto components to photo voltaic panels and sportswear. If issues go in keeping with plan, this might convey funding value as a lot as $37 billion over two to a few years and increase wages by $55 billion yearly, in keeping with Crisil, an affiliate of S&P Global Inc.

That’s the good half, one which has a shot at success in the present local weather. Rising U.S.-China tensions are forcing world companies to broaden their provide chains. Where Modi is going incorrect — and repeating Nehru’s mistake — is in selecting self-sufficiency over openness.

East Asian nations like Taiwan and South Korea acknowledged pretty early that labor-intensive manufacturing was their pure benefit. They performed to it. India didn’t. Nehru’s heavy-industry method did not create employment for the huddled plenty. Perhaps the Soviets needed the penalties of their mannequin to creep up on India and result in collectivization of farming below strain from a rising, restive inhabitants that wasn’t actually wanted on the land however had few manufacturing unit jobs to go to. Luckily for India, Nehru by no means went that far.

The financial system began opening up in the Nineties. Industrial licensing went away, tariffs started to fall. Led by pc software program, skills-based exports grew quickly, Yet the blunder of not exploiting low cost, unskilled labor by no means actually stopped mattering. India was teeming with 500 million folks at the time of Nehru’s dying in 1964. Modi has to create jobs for a inhabitants of greater than 1.3 billion that’s bulging with younger folks — and youth underemployment.


The period of Covid-19 has spilled the long-festering drawback, masked lately by the rise of an city gig financial system, into the open. With 75 million folks pushed again into poverty, the center class hollowed out and fewer than 6% employment for girls in cities, there’s no level in pretending that India has by some means made a large leap from agriculture to software program, and that it will not must make shirts and sneakers.

But to fabricate something for the world, one thing must be imported. Take windbreakers. Indian suppliers appealed to the authorities for greater than 4 years to take away the anti-dumping responsibility on purified terephthalic acid, a key uncooked materials. It was pushing up prices throughout the worth chain and making India uncompetitive in artificial textiles. Finally, the responsibility went away final yr.

Other industries are much less fortunate. Even outstanding commerce economists like Arvind Panagariya, who served in the early years of the Modi regime and is sympathetic to its zeal to reform a couple of issues, are dismayed by creeping protectionism. As the Columbia University professor famous in a latest lecture, the proportion of import tariff strains in India with charges exceeding 15% went previous the one-quarter mark final yr, greater than double from a decade earlier. With tariffs on inputs being increased in lots of instances than the customs responsibility on completed items, researchers ask if India will be capable of replicate China’s success with world meeting strains.

There is a possibility for India to compete. Chinese producers are elevating costs, stoking world inflation fears. Washington needs a affluent safety associate in Asia to include China’s affect. No Soviet Gosplan consultants are respiratory down Modi’s neck like they did in Nehru’s days. So why is the present prime minister selecting autarky, and turning away from commerce liberalization?

Maybe the home political financial system is forcing Modi’s hand. From metal to cement and autos, and from telecommunications to airports and seaports, economic energy in India has concentrated sharply over the previous a number of years. A monopolist likes the safety of tall import boundaries. Modi is more and more obliging. Yet if something, now is the time India needs to be doubling down on the successes of the Nineties by broadening skills-heavy exports to incorporate labor-intensive items. On this measure, Vietnam and Bangladesh are doing higher.

Modi may evoke self-sufficiency to stave off India’s over-dependence on China. The industries India is betting on, from telecom gear to photovoltaic cells and lively pharmaceutical substances, all import closely from the People’s Republic. It’s a vulnerability. Territorial tensions relationship from Nehru’s time stay a thorn in Modi’s facet even now.

The extra Modi tries to relegate Nehru to the again pages of historical past, the extra the first prime minister leaps out. That import substitution is the widespread floor between two such vastly completely different leaders and regimes is disturbing. By the late Fifties, Nehru had turned vital of the “disease of giganticism” unleashed by planning. Modi, too, must be taught that self-sufficiency gained’t put meals on the desk. Only jobs will.

Disclaimer: Views expressed listed here are writer’s personal




Leave a comment