“You go to the Calcutta High Court,” a bench headed by Chief Justice S A Bobde informed the counsel showing for the petitioners.
The bench, additionally comprising Justices A S Bopanna and V Ramasubramanian, allowed the petitioners’ lawyer to withdraw the plea with liberty to method the excessive courtroom.
On March 10, Banerjee had alleged that she was attacked by “four-five men” in Nandigram, injuring her left leg, hours after she filed nomination from the seat the place the BJP has pitted her protege-turned-adversary Suvendu Adhikari in the Assembly election.
The plea, filed in the apex courtroom by petitioners Shubham Awasthi and two others, had claimed that the alleged attack on a Constitutional functionary needs to be investigated by an impartial company just like the CBI and the probe findings needs to be made public to strengthen the voters confidence.
It had sought instructions to the involved authorities to have tips to deal with such incidents in future and for creation of a brief physique with intensive powers to look into ballot violence and punish the perpetrators.
The plea had additionally sought a route for enhanced punishment for ballot violence.
“Such an attack on a Constitutional functionary violates the idea of a free and fair elections and has given free reign to political parties to influence voters,” the plea, filed by advocate Vivek Narayan Sharma, had mentioned.
It had claimed that for the reason that alleged attack, the environment in West Bengal has been crammed with allegations and counter allegations by totally different political events.
“Poll violence is an anathema to the idea of free and fair elections and they need to be investigated in order to…achieve the goals which guide the functioning of a democracy,” it had mentioned.