San Francisco Mayor wants to slash red tape for building new housing


SAN FRANCISCO (KRON) — San Francisco’s mayor is pushing to slash red tape for building permits as the city struggles with housing and homelessness.

Mayor London Breed, City Administrator Carmen Chu, the Department of Building Inspection, and the Planning Department announced an effort to improve San Francisco’s Site Permit approval process that is expected to dramatically reduce development timelines by months and even years.

The reform is part of Breed’s “Housing for All initiative,” which sets the goals and policies to allow for 82,000 new homes to be built over the next 8 years.   

According to the Mayor’s Office, the proposal would streamline the city’s process for issuing a key project approval known as a “Site Permit,” which will reduce permitting times for new developments and major renovations.

The change will require legislation which is currently being drafted and will be introduced in the coming weeks after an April public forum.

Analysis of past projects show the change could have saved up to 65% on some projects. The time savings comes from moving intake, administration and approval of the design, environmental review, and zoning entitlements from the Department of Building Inspection to the Planning Department.

“To build the housing we need for our residents and for the future of San Francisco, we must produce faster, more transparent and less costly housing construction,” said Mayor Breed. “A centerpiece of my Housing for All plan is shedding barriers and burdens that are counter-productive to meeting our housing goals. Streamlining this approval process is a good start in our work to untangle the complicated bureaucracy that has unnecessarily slowed housing development for decades.”

On February 7, Breed issued her Housing for All Executive Directive. She said it will fundamentally change how the city approves and builds housing.  As part of the executive directive, the Department of Building Inspection and Planning Department are required to assess permitting timelines, identify opportunities to reduce review times, and implement process improvements to speed housing delivery in San Francisco.   

How the Site Permit Process Works Now

San Francisco currently offers developers the option of securing their design approval, environmental clearance, and zoning entitlements through a Site Permit for projects that do not otherwise need Planning Commission approval. The Department of Building Inspection administers the clerical aspects of the site permit process, while the Planning Department manages the design review, environmental review and zoning entitlements.  

The Site Permit can be requested from the Department of Building Inspection before securing all the required Planning Department approvals. The process is often used for larger projects so that the initial construction can get underway while the remaining construction documents are still being reviewed and revised.  

The Mayor’s Office wrote, “Unfortunately, the current site permit process triggers multiple rounds of project reviews and revisions which require more time, are sometimes redundant and conflicting, and always expensive.”

Proposed New Streamlined Process  

The proposal will bifurcate the current Site Permit review process to substantially reduce the overall development timeline by standardizing the process and eliminating redundant stages during project and permit review. The new site permit process will feature fewer administrative steps, consolidate plan review, and reduce the number of times an applicant is asked to revise a plan for code compliance by having all the relevant departments review a project concurrently. With this narrower scope of review and a consistent, streamlined process, the Planning Department will be able to analyze projects faster, saving applicants time and money.   

Standardization of the site permit process will also establish greater transparency and a more predictable project review process at the Planning Department and Department of Building Inspection. Permit applicants will receive clear direction from the City about the information and additional permits required for their project.  

Potential Impacts and Time Savings  

To evaluate the potential impacts of the proposed process, the City Administrator’s Permit Center analyzed previously approved site permit projects and found that they could have achieved substantial time savings from the proposed process and concurrent plan review. For example:  

  • A large apartment building on Market Street could have reduced its approval timeline from 4.25 years to 2.3 years.
  • A condominium development on Tennessee Street could have shaved 1.5 years off the approval process – from 2.5 years to ten months, a 65%-time savings.   
  • Similarly, a commercial warehouse on Indiana Street could have saved nine months, while a commercial condominium project on Stanyan Street could have saved ten months.  

“Improving the site permit process will both speed housing production and create a better, more efficient system for people who want to build in San Francisco,” said City Administrator Carmen Chu. “There is no single magic solution, instead, every painstaking day we shave off the development process is a day sooner a person can be living in a new home in the City.”

“This is a major improvement in how we review and approve major construction projects in San Francisco,” said Patrick O’Riordan, Director of the Department of Building Inspection. “It’s a smarter way of doing business that is going to produce housing in less time.”

The Mayor’s Office and the departments involved are now soliciting input and drafting legislation to codify these changes. The City plans to host a public forum for community input on April 19 and then have the proposal considered at a joint Building Inspection Commission and Planning Commission meeting on May 18.  



Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! My droll is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a comment