Pentagon Suspends Deliveries of F-35 Fighters After Finding Engine Part Came From China

0

The Pentagon said on Sept 7 that it has halted deliveries of fifth-generation F-35 fighter jets after a component used in the plane’s engine was found to be sourced from China.

U.S. Defense giant Lockheed Martin, the company making the F-35s, said the component is a magnet on the plane’s turbomachine pumps manufactured by U.S. aerospace parts maker Honeywell International. The defense company added that the magnet was made with a cobalt and samarium alloy that originated from China.

A turbomachine is a part of what Lockheed Martin calls the F-35 aircraft’s “integrated power package,” which provides electrical power to start the plane’s engine.

On Sept. 7, Russell Goemaere, spokesperson of the F-35 Lightning II Joint Program Office (JPO), a Pentagon agency, told news outlets in a statement that the office became aware of the alloy’s origin last month, and the issue “is potentially in non-compliance” with federal defense acquisition regulations.

“The F-35 JPO temporarily paused the acceptance of new F-35 aircraft to ensure the F-35 program’s compliance,” Goemaere said.

Not Resulted in Security Risks

However, Goemaere said the magnet in question has not resulted in any security risks.

“We have confirmed that the magnet does not transmit information or harm the integrity of the aircraft, and there are no performance, quality, safety, or security risks associated with this issue, and flight operations for the F-35 in-service fleet will continue as normal,” Goemaere said.

“Once the issue was discovered,” the F-35 JPO “found an alternative source for the alloy that will be used in future turbomachine,” Goemaere continued.

Goemaere added, “Further investigation is underway to understand the causal factors for the non-compliance and to establish corrective action.”

An F-35B fighter jet prepares for take-off from the flight deck of UK Carrier Strike Groups HMS Queen Elizabeth in the Arabian Sea, off Mumbai coast on Oct. 21, 2021. (Punit Paranjpe/AFP via Getty Images)

Lockheed Martin and Honeywell have each provided a statement to Politico.

“We are working with our partners and DoD to ensure contractual compliance within the supply chain,” Lockheed Martin spokesperson Laura Siebert said. “The F-35 remains safe for flight, and we are working with the DoD to resolve the issue as quickly as possible to resume deliveries.”

“We are working closely with DOD and Lockheed Martin to ensure that we continue to achieve those commitments on products Honeywell supplies for use on the F-35,” Honeywell spokesperson Adam Kress said.

The U.S. Government Accounting Office said in April the U.S. Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps have 450 F-35 fighter jets, and the Pentagon plans to buy 2,500 in total.

Decouple From China: Expert

Responding to the Pentagon’s decision, Anders Corr, principal at the New York-based political consultancy firm Corr Analytics, took to Twitter to say the United States should decouple from China.

“The U.S. discovered a Chinese magnet in the F-35 engine and is removing it,” Corr wrote while tagging the NATO. “Now if only our leaders realize that our economies are just as critical as our F-35s to collective defense from China, we can all proceed with economic decoupling.”

Corr made a similar call in May, after Secretary of State Antony Blinken said the United States won’t decouple from China and the two nations “have to deal with each other for the foreseeable future,” in a speech outlining the Biden administration’s China strategy.

“In fact, we can increasingly decouple from China, if we make that choice,” Corr wrote in response to Blinken’s speech. “And, moving towards that choice gradually gives us more bargaining leverage with Beijing.”

Since the start of the U.S.-China trade war, the concept of decoupling, or separation between certain sectors of the U.S. and Chinese economies, has become a much-talked-about option for the United States.

Companies dependent on Chinese supply chains are vulnerable to the Chinese regime’s influence. The Chinese Communist Party is also known for carrying out espionage activities, stealing intellectual property and trade secrets from companies and institutions.

NTD Photo
Former President Donald Trump (L) talks to Chairman, President, and CEO of Lockheed Martin Marillyn Hewson (R) and Director and Chief Test Pilot Alan Norman (2nd L) in front of an F-35 fighter jet during the 2018 Made in America Product Showcase at the White House in Washington on July 23, 2018. (Alex Wong/Getty Images)

Former President Donald Trump raised the idea of decoupling from China during his presidency. Some Republican lawmakers have also made the same call.

‘China Has Been a Predatory Investor’

In February 2021, Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ariz.) released a new report on China, calling for the decoupling of certain U.S. and Chinese sectors, including critical minerals, entertainment, higher education, telecommunications, and semiconductors.

A month later, Rep. Mark Green (R-Tenn.) recommended that the United States should support the development of a manufacturing base in Latin America as the United States decouples from China.

Recently, Sen. Kevin Cramer (R-N.D.), in an interview on the “Capitol Report” program on NTD in July,  said, “we ought to find ways to decouple ourselves from China, not find more ways to bring them in, particularly with investments our country.”

“China has been a predatory investor for a long time,” Cramer continued. “They’ve demonstrated a willingness to use economic enticement to gain access to very important assets.”

Cramer added, “We can’t just simply be addicted to [China’s] cheap stuff as an economic strategy because at the end of the day, it ends up costing more than you gain.”

From The Epoch Times

FOLLOW us ON GOOGLE NEWS

 

Read original article here

Denial of responsibility! My droll is an automatic aggregator of the all world’s media. In each content, the hyperlink to the primary source is specified. All trademarks belong to their rightful owners, all materials to their authors. If you are the owner of the content and do not want us to publish your materials, please contact us by email – [email protected]. The content will be deleted within 24 hours.

Leave a comment