Court directs police to re-investigate 2011 case related to purported phone conversation of Shanti Bhushan, Mulayam Singh Yadav, Amar Singh
“IO (Investigating Officer) is directed to investigate the contents of the CD in question and file a report,” Chief Metropolitan Magistrate Dr Pankaj Sharma stated, whereas directing the IO to file the report by March 25.
However, the IO failed to file the report, and the courtroom, on March 25, stated, “Let the IO be summoned for filing the report in terms of previous order for July 15, 2021.”
The information relating to the CD was reported in media earlier that month.
In the purported phone conversation involving Bhushan, Yadav and Singh, who handed away final yr, Bhushan allegedly referred to his lawyer-son Prashant Bhushan who can “manage… very well” and to a then Supreme Court choose.
The police had in April 2014 filed an “untrace report”.
It stated Shanti Bhushan “suspected that ‘Amar Singh could be behind the fabrication and circulation of the audio CD to malign his reputation” and that its circulation among the many media “was intended as an attempt to force him to leave the joint drafting committee for the Jan Lokpal Bill, since Kapil Sibal and P Chidambaram, then Union Ministers, were against his participation as co-chairman of the drafting committee”.
However, he “could not put forward any worthwhile evidence in support of his allegations against Chidambaram, Sibal and Singh except oral allegations.”
The police report added that “it is not correct to proceed against anyone only on the basis of presumptions and without any substantial and corroborative evidence. Hence this case is being filed as untraced for want of any sufficient evidence.”
In its report, the police additionally rejected a declare made by Prashant Bhushan, citing a Central Forensic Science Laboratory-Delhi report that that the contents of the CD had not been copied from the Amar Singh tapes that did the rounds following alleged tapping of his phone in 2005-06.
Bhushans, who had been at the moment non-government representatives in a panel constituted to draft the Lokpal Bill following a quick by social activist Anna Hazare, denied that the phone conversation ever came about and known as it a “conspiracy” to weaken Anna Hazare’s motion.